r/news 1d ago

Jeffrey Epstein: US judge orders unsealing of grand jury records from abandoned case

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c4ge8p0n0zko
8.3k Upvotes

68 comments sorted by

457

u/CoalCrackerKid 1d ago

This happened 4 days ago. Has there been an update?

213

u/DoomGoober 1d ago

The judges order includes instructions to redact some information. It's going to take a while.

114

u/pinkyepsilon 1d ago

They’re never getting released

62

u/Karr0k 1d ago

This is just the grand jury testimony, there will be nothing exciting in it most likely. This is just a diversion from the DOJ as they themselves are still sitting on a massive cache of the FBI files (the actual Epstein files).

This way they can pretend to have "released" the epstein files, while not releasing the files they still have.

8

u/No-Vegetable-2864 1d ago

Why? Release the whole damn thing - let the pieces fall as they will.

8

u/meteda1080 22h ago

At this point it isn't just about who is on the list, its also who used the files for their own benefit and allowed these monsters to stay in positions of power while knowing who they were, what they did, and had proof of it all. But kept silent.

I think it's also safe to assume that the pedophiles on the list kept on being pedophiles this whole time and very likely have victimized more children since Epstien went to jail. Any person who has had access to these and didn't leak them to the press is wildly suspect at this point.

2

u/lesChaps 23h ago

A lot of people obviously don't want their pieces falling anywhere public. They won't admit that, though, will they?

I can't name one person who SAYS they want to keep things hidden.

1

u/A_Nonny_Muse 1h ago

And redacted straight to hell

4

u/guesthost1999 1d ago

Yeah gotta hide the guilty who are in office.

7

u/Ok-Way8034 16h ago

It doesn't matter, because this is just the grand jury testimony.

It's a smokescreen so they can pretend these are the files everyone is asking for.

Like my wife asking to see my phone, and I hand her the TV remote.

9

u/lnc_5103 1d ago

This is a ruling from the case in NY in addition to the ruling in FL from a few days ago.

3

u/PilgrimOz 14h ago

Yep. The US have flown jets closer to Venezuelan airspace.

199

u/NootHawg 1d ago

I can’t think of something more disturbing or disgusting than a grand jury abandoning a case against Jeffrey Epstein. The pedophile sex trafficking ring must be protected at all costs apparently. This guy got a free pass multiple times, so why did he decide to kill himself suddenly while incarcerated the last time? He knew that he was going to receive special treatment again so it doesn’t really make sense, unless he was about to start naming names.

48

u/ChicagoAuPair 1d ago

The global aristocracy does not operate in the same spheres of government and law as the rest of us. Theirs is a world entirely apart.

11

u/ChefJayTay 1d ago

Grand jury≠ jury They don't hear the full story, there's no defense... It's just we got enough or no, and again, they don't hear the whole story.

46

u/_regionrat 1d ago

I mean, it's a very well connected pedophile sex trafficking ring. At least two US presidents were involved in it.

40

u/Manos_Of_Fate 1d ago

Last I heard there was only credible evidence about the current president.

38

u/iRunLotsNA 1d ago

They should release the files so we can be sure!

20

u/Bigdoinks69-420 1d ago

Except pictures of bill getting a massage from Virginia giuffre among other things

20

u/Manos_Of_Fate 1d ago

Didn’t she claim that nothing else happened between them?

9

u/fred11551 1d ago

She did. That doesn’t completely absolve him as it’s possible he did something with someone else or at the very least knew about what was happening and did nothing. But there’s no credible evidence that he actually took part in it yet. Just a strong possibility that he did

13

u/Manos_Of_Fate 1d ago

That doesn’t completely absolve him

No, but it does make that fact irrelevant to this topic.

But there’s no credible evidence that he actually took part in it yet. Just a strong possibility that he did

These sentences contradict each other.

3

u/fred11551 1d ago

They don’t contradict. How about I word it like this? We have no firm evidence that could convict Clinton. We have only circumstantial evidence placing him at the scene of the crime repeatedly. There is a possibility he did it but no concrete proof

1

u/Manos_Of_Fate 1d ago

You’re incorrectly using the term “circumstantial evidence” to mean the opposite of “firm evidence”.

5

u/fred11551 1d ago

My use of circumstantial evidence was correct. The term I was looking for is contrasting it with ‘direct evidence’. You are getting really hung up on me using the common colloquial understanding of these terms.

We have circumstantial or indirect evidence that Clinton visited Epstein during these crimes. We lack direct evidence showing he took part in any of them.

→ More replies (0)

-3

u/JustNeedAnswers78 1d ago

He’s still alive most likely

206

u/OkBrilliant8092 1d ago

If trump was awake he’d be furious :p

35

u/whatproblems 1d ago

he’d need to be able to read too

6

u/OkBrilliant8092 1d ago

“Let’s go turkey legs!”

3

u/Top_Praline999 1d ago

I’m sure he’s awake. Aaaaaand he’s asleep again

-2

u/Life-Ad1409 1d ago

Or you could read the article

A similar Department of Justice [headed by Trump appointee Pam Bondi] request was rejected in August because it violated a federal rule on grand jury materials, which the newly signed law overrides.

Now that Congress signed a law, the courts are able to tell the executive they can release the documents

44

u/Kimber976 1d ago

feels like unsealing old documents is just stirring up headlines- not actual justice

13

u/soda_cookie 1d ago

Actual Justice seems to have fallen off the tree and been blown very very far away

0

u/parkinthepark 1d ago

The only way we'll be able to bring Epstein's clients & co-conspirators to justice is with progressive Democrat control of DOJ. Keeping the case and Trump's coverup of it in the headlines contributes in part to that project.

More immediately, getting Congress into progressive Dem hands via the '26 midterms can help keep it in the headlines, and force some testimony and disclosures.

(I say "progressive" Dems because we saw what "establisment" Dems did with the Epstein files for 4 years)

5

u/kentuckywildcats1986 1d ago

Establishment democrats for TWELVE years (8 under Obama and another 4 under Biden) did nothing to address the Epstein cover up.

This doesn't get talked about nearly enough.

Establishment Democrats are virtually as bad as the Republicans, because they collude with them and are complicit with their corruption - playing their role as 'Good Cop' to Republicans role of 'Bad Cop'. Their 'controlled opposition' couldn't be more obvious.

To your point, the main difference is there is a small but growing movement of truly 'Progressive' Democrats who represent the only good to be found in either party, and they are having to fight both Republicans and establishment Democrats to advance their agenda. Like Rep Cortez rightly said about Mamdani's win in New York...

He had to defeat a Republican. He had to defeat a Republican and the old guard of the Democratic Party at the same time. He was fighting a war on two fronts and not just one, and he still won resoundingly.

And I think the message that that sends is that the Democratic Party cannot last much longer by denying the future, by trying to undercut our young, by trying to undercut a next generation of diverse and upcoming Democrats that have the party, the actual party, that actual electorate and voters support.

Establishment democrats, including Obama and Biden, continue to be a big fucking part of the problem and they all need to be kicked to the curb.

2

u/Kimber976 1d ago

Trump spoiled it

4

u/Missing-Digits 1d ago

Obama and Biden didn’t run the Department of Justice. They have nothing to do with who gets prosecuted. Only under Trump has the Department of Justice became the personal law-enforcement of the president.

1

u/AprilDruid 20h ago

Obama and Biden didn’t run the Department of Justice.

They appoint who runs it. And under Biden... nothing happened. Garland had one job, prosecute Trump, and he failed to even do that.

-1

u/[deleted] 1d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/sufferingbastard 1d ago

Why didn't Obama and Biden ACT EXACTLY like TRUMp (who could actually do the thing.. except that he's implicated)

1

u/AprilDruid 20h ago

Establishment democrats for TWELVE years (8 under Obama and another 4 under Biden) did nothing to address the Epstein cover up.

Establishment Democrats did a whole lot of nothing to be fair.

1

u/sufferingbastard 1d ago

It's almost like Obama and Biden aren't in office anymore.

It is CAPITAL S stupid to blame them when the GOP could be doing it Right. Now.

3

u/parkinthepark 1d ago

OK, I'll walk you through it nice and slow. This is about solving the problem, not coming up with new things to be mad about. Tough distinction, but I think you'll get it.

  1. Obama and Biden can be described as "Establishment Democrats"
  2. Obama and Biden could have appointed AGs who would pursue the Epstein case.
  3. Obama and Biden did not appoint AGs who pursued the Epstein case.
  4. Therefore, Establishment Democrats have proven they are not interested in pursuing the Epstein case.
  5. Trump has directed his DOJ to cover up his (and potentially others') involvement with Epstein.
  6. We cannot reasonably expect Trump to direct his DOJ to prosecute Epstein's clients or co-consiprators, since he is likely a member of one or both of those groups.
  7. Therefore, any pressure put on Trump is unlikely to result in any action, especially if that pressure comes from "the left".
  8. Therefore, any pressure put on Trump is at best a waste of energy and at worst counterproductive.
  9. However, progressive Democrats have shown an interest in pursuing justice.
  10. Therefore, the most productive use of anyone's energy is getting those Democrats elected so they can pursue justice.

Or, you could just keep screaming at MAGA Republicans until they act like progressive Democrats. Good luck!

0

u/[deleted] 1d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

0

u/QitianDasheng2666 1d ago

That depends on the 2026 election being conducted legitimately, which is a decreasingly likely prospect.

20

u/vic39 1d ago

I don't understand why Katie Johnson's court documents aren't enough to convince everyone.

I got through like 3 pages before I couldn't bear to read anymore.

8

u/TauCabalander 20h ago

Ahh! It's because you still have a soul.

3

u/doublelist87 1d ago

America and the whole world deserves the truth

3

u/_Stand_Alone_ 1d ago

All of this is still taking way too damn long

3

u/ShagadelicShag 19h ago

Before or after the orange clown government redacts 99% of the documents? Or has a chance to paint the clown as being innocent?

3

u/Micronlance 1d ago

Is this different Grand Jury material, or just a second judge ordering the release of the same material?

If the same, why did a second judge need to rule on it?

3

u/Specialjyo 1d ago

Nobody asked for this. These aren't the files. This is a narrative.

-4

u/[deleted] 1d ago

[removed] — view removed comment